Scientific-ness

After my previous post about the need to change the education system in China, if China is to have a responsible role in the World, I am happy to report (NY times):

"The new standard world history text drops wars, dynasties and Communist revolutions in favor of colorful tutorials on economics, technology, social customs and globalization.

Socialism has been reduced to a single, short chapter in the senior high school history course. Chinese Communism before the economic reform that began in 1979 is covered in a sentence. The text mentions Mao only once — in a chapter on etiquette.

Nearly overnight the country's most prosperous schools have shelved the Marxist template that had dominated standard history texts since the 1950's. The changes passed high-level scrutiny, the authors say, and are part of a broader effort to promote a more stable, less violent view of Chinese history that serves today's economic and political goals.". Though I have to admit that I didn't learn much at School about Asian history (rather important economically for the world) or even about Africa and colonialism. What did I learn that was useful?

China is very keen on science. It's translation of science is 'best', therefore China wants a scientific method od development. Presumably this requires research into what the best method of development is, then implementation and evaluation. hmm, well i guess sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Science never manages to deal with people's emotions, unpredictableness etc. For example most Chinese cities, when creating (or changing) their street names, chose to do so in an orderly (and identical) fashion. There are loads of 'Peace Street' or 'Beijing Street' for example and plenty of '2nd ring road, south section, east end'. It makes sense, if say you are an American, where most habitations only have a couple hundred years of history (presumably not much is named after native americans), but in China, with 5,000 years, why are all the street names the same across the country? So boring!

I miss the UK with 'pudding lane', 'grimsdyke road' and millions of other examples. I guess most streets are named after people who lived there, their professions, or places along the road. And in China the system extends to schools and hospitals, eg. Beijing 101st Primary School! On another note, I am told that in teh early 80s during China's opening up, Xi'an's stupid government decided to imitate Shenzhen (a brand new city near Hong Kong) to become a beautiful garden city, with parks, flowers and grass. They promptly cut down or allowed to die most of the trees, replacing it with grass.

Of course they failed to anticipate things like:
-the grass cannot survive in a city with little water
-the trees played a crucial role in drainage
-trees use up CO2 and create O2, grass doesn't
.... leading us to a city permanently grey and smoggy.. apparently the wind normally comes from the north so blows the pollution from factories or coal mines in to Xi'an and it gets stuck here, because of the mountains to the South. Any other direction would be fine as there are no mountains to the E, W or N, stupid wind!

Then of course you have all the stupid unscientific ideas, like sending students off to the countryside, with few skills and few ideas or plans to create any lasting change.. 1 recent campaign led to students advising and helping build B&B equivalents -i wonder if they investigated is there is actually a market for this? You also have the military service that every University student (and some high school students) do. It involves 1-2 weeks (once in your life) marching. It culminates in each 'cadre' firing 5 real bullets. Everyone calls it a joke and hates it. I don't think it benefits the country at all, helps install any discipline, provides any useful skills, or prepares students to defend the country in terms of crisis. Old habits die hard.....

An interesting interview in the Times, Wen Jiabao (PM) said though democracy is occuring at local levels, it will not grow until Chinese society can handle it and that it is not the most pressing problem: inequality or environmental degradation (and many others) are. He seems to fail to recognise that democracy can help solve those problems! There is an excellent commentary that I totally agree with on the problems in China and role of the media: spot-on.

and finally.... Bullet and bomb proof WC in Beijing

I am not quite sure the point of this -is it to throw a bomb in, so it can be detoanted safely? -is it for all of zhonguancun to try to squeeze into the toilet when there is a bomb threat? -Is it just that some American company bribed a local official to buy their latest invention which they couldn't even sell in the USA?

any other ideas?